When a relationship ends, most people assume the legal bond disappears with it. In reality, Italian criminal law draws a much more complex line. According to recent case law, even after separation, certain behaviours between spouses can still be treated as domestic abuse rather than stalking.
The Court of Cassation has reaffirmed a key principle: the end of cohabitation does not automatically end the family relationship in legal terms.
Separation does not erase the family bond
The core idea behind the Court’s interpretation is surprisingly simple. Marriage creates a legal status that does not fully dissolve with separation.
Even when spouses live in different homes, they are still bound by duties established under Article 143 of the Civil Code, including mutual respect and moral assistance.
Separation only suspends specific obligations such as cohabitation and fidelity. It does not remove the broader framework of protection that the law attaches to the family unit.
In a recent ruling (Cass. sent. 7357/2026), the Court confirmed that a separated spouse can still be considered a “family member” for the purposes of criminal protection. This classification has a direct impact on how abusive behaviour is legally framed.
Stalking or mistreatment: why the distinction matters One of the most important legal consequences concerns how the offence is classified.
If violence or harassment occurs between separated spouses, it is generally not treated as stalking under Article 612-bis of the Criminal Code. Instead, it falls under the more serious offence of mistreatment within the family under Article 572 of the Criminal Code.
The reasoning is that the conduct does not arise between strangers or former partners in isolation, but within a continuing legal relationship that the law still recognises as “familial”.
In practice, this means that even after separation, abusive behaviour is interpreted as a continuation of domestic violence rather than a new pattern of harassment.
When behaviour continues over time
Courts also place strong emphasis on continuity.
If abusive conduct begins during cohabitation and continues after separation, it is not divided into separate incidents. Instead, it is treated as a single ongoing pattern of mistreatment.
For example:
- a husband insults and threatens his wife during marriage
- the wife moves out to escape the situation
- the husband continues with threats or humiliating messages during custody exchanges or phone calls
In this scenario, the entire sequence is assessed as one continuous abusive dynamic.
The key element is not where the behaviour occurs, but the fact that it stems from the same underlying relationship and pattern of control.
When children are present: an added layer of seriousness
A particularly sensitive aspect concerns the presence of minor children during episodes of violence.
Italian law provides for an aggravating circumstance when abusive conduct is committed in front of minors. However, courts have clarified that it is not necessary to prove psychological trauma in order for this aggravation to apply.
It is enough that the child has been repeatedly exposed to violent behaviour.
The Court of Cassation has repeatedly confirmed that even witnessing verbal aggression or physical violence can be sufficient to justify the aggravating factor (Cass. VI n. 20128/2025; Cass. VI n. 27802/2025).
The focus is on the potential impact on the child’s development, not on proving long-term harm in advance.
A legal approach focused on protection
Recent rulings show a clear direction in Italian jurisprudence: the law prioritises the continuity of protection over formal changes in relationship status.
Earlier decisions had already established that legal separation does not interrupt the protective framework of the family unit (Cass. VI n. 45400/2022).
More recent case law continues this approach, ensuring that offenders cannot benefit from a lighter legal classification simply because the couple is no longer living together.
In the case examined by the Court, the initial classification that split the behaviour into separate offences was overturned. The judges required a reassessment of the facts as a single offence of mistreatment, with a corresponding recalculation of the sentence.
VGS Family Lawyers is a law firm that offers assistance to English-speaking clients with interests in Italy. In case you need assistance, please write to: info@vgslawyers.com